Yangın ve Güvenlik Dergisi 233. Sayı (Eylül 2022)

43 YANGIN ve GÜVENLİK • Eylül / 2022 ÇEVİRİ MAKALE KAYNAKLAR [1] UITP 2018 World Metro Figures 2018 Ed UITP - International Association of Public Transport (Bruxelles, Belgium) 8 p. [2] UITP 2018 World report on metro automation Ed International Association of Public Transport (Bruxelles, Belgium) 8 p. [3] Wikipedia. List of terrorist incidents involving railway systems. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_involving_railway_ systems (accessed August 2019). [4] Furfaro D and Lapin T 2019 MTA plan to stop subway fires isn’t working htttps://nypost.com/2018/07/24/mta-plan-to-stop-subway-fires-isnt-working/ (accessed August 2019). [5] Wikipedia. Platform screen doors. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Platform_screen_doors (accessed August 2019). [6] Chung Y W, Kang S J, Matsubayashi T, Sawada Y and Ueda M 2016 J. Affect. Disord The effectiveness of platform screen doors for the prevention of subway suicides in South Korea 194 80–83 [7] Ueda M, Sawada Y and Matsubayashi T 2015 J. Affect. Disord The effectiveness of installing physical barriers for preventing railway suicides and accidents: Evidence from Japan 178 1– 4 [8] Soeta Y and Shimokura R 2012 Appl. Acoust Change of acoustic characteristics caused by platform screen doors in train stations 73 535–542 [9] Hu S C and Lee J H 2004 Energy Convers. Manag Influence of platform screen doors on energy consumption of the environment control system of a mass rapid transit system: Case study of the Taipei MRT system 45 639–650 [10] Han H, Lee J Y and Jang K J 2015 Indoor Built Environ Effect of platform screen doors on the indoor air environment of an underground subway station 24 672–681 [11] Hwang S H and Cho J H 2016 Air Qual. Atmos. Heal Evaluation of airborne fungi and the effects of a platform screen door and station depth in 25 underground subway stations in Seoul, South Korea 9 561–568 [12] Son Y S, Jeon J S, Lee H J, Ryu I C and Kim J C 2014 J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. Installation of platform screen doors and their impact on indoor air quality: Seoul subway trains 64 1054–1061 [13] McGrattan K, Hostikka S, McDermott R, Floyd J, Weinschenk C and Overholt K 2015 Technical Reference Guide Fire Dynamics Simulator Volume 2: Verification 6.3 4 [14] Haddad R K, Maluk C, Reda E and Harun Z 2019 J. Combust Critical velocity and backlayering conditions in rail tunnel fires: state-of-the-art review 2019 [15] Hu L H, Huo R, Wang H B and Yang R X 2007 J. Fire Sci. Experimental and numerical studies on longitudinal smoke temperature distribution upstream and downstream from the fire in a road tunnel 25 23–43 [16] Purser D A 2009 Fire Prot. Life Saf. Build. Transp. Syst. Work Application of human behaviour and toxic hazard analysis to the validation of CFD modelling for the Mont Blanc Tunnel fire incident 23–57 [17] Purser D A 2010 Fire Toxic. Toxic hazard calculation models for use with fire effluent data 619–636 [18] Weng M C, Lu X L, Liu F and Du C X 2016 Appl. Therm. Eng. Study on the critical velocity in a sloping tunnel fire under longitudinal ventilation 94 422–434 [19] Vauquelin O and Wu Y 2006 Fire Saf. J. Influence of tunnel width on longitudinal smoke control 4 420–426 [20] Wu F, Jiang J C and Zhou R 2018 Proc.Eng. 8th Int. Conf. on Fire Sc. And Fire Prot. Eng. Smoke flow temperature beneath the ceiling in an atryum-style subway station with different fire source locations 21 794-800 [21] Zhang S et al 2017 Fire Technol. Numerical Investigation of Back-Layering Length and Critical Velocity in Curved Subway Tunnels with Different Turning Radius 53 1765–1793 [22] Huang Y D, Li C and Kim N C 2012 J. Hydrodyn. A numerical analysis of the ventilation performance for different ventilation strategies in a subway tunnel 24 193–201 [23] Kazemipour A, Afshin H and Farhanieh B 2017 Heat Transf. Eng. Numerical– Analytical Assessment of Fire and Ventilation Interaction in Longitudinally Ventilated Tunnels Using Jet Fans 38 523–537 [24] Zhang S et al 2016 Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. Prediction of smoke back- layering length under different longitudinal ventilations in the subway tunnel with metro train 53 13–21 [25] Zhang L, Wu X, Liu M, Liu W and Ashuri B 2019 Autom. Constr. Discovering worst fire scenarios in subway stations: A simulation approach 99 183–196 [26] Gao R, Li A, Hao X, Lei W, Zhao Y and Deng B 2012 Energy Build. Fire- induced smoke control via hybrid ventilation in a huge transit terminal subway station 45 280–289 [27] Luo N, Li A, Gao R, Song T, Zhang W and Hu Z 2014 Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. Performance of smoke elimination and confinement with modified hybrid ventilation for subway station 43 140–147 [28] Guo X and Zhang Q 2014 Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. Analytical solution, experimental data and CFD simulation for longitudinal tunnel fire ventilation 42 307–313 [29] Weng M C, Lu X L, Liu F, Shi X P and Yu L X 2015 Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. Prediction of backlayering length and critical velocity in metro tunnel fires 47 64–72 [30] Harish R and Venkatasubbaiah K 2014 Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. Effects of buoyancy induced roof ventilation systems for smoke removal in tunnel fires 42 195–205 [31] Lee S R, Nam D G and Moriyama S 2007 Fire Safety Science Digital Archive A numerical study on the effect of smoke control systems in subway station fires 169 [32] Yucel N, Berberoglu M I, Karaaslan S and Dinler N 2009 World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. Experimental and numerical simulation of fire in a scaled underground station 40 309–314 [33] Vega M G, Díaz K M, Fernández Oro J M, Tajadura R B and Santolaria Morros C 2008 Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. Numerical 3D simulation of a longitudinal ventilation system: Memorial Tunnel case 23 539–551 [34] Teodosiu C, Ilie V, Dumitru R and Teodosiu R 2016 Energy Procedia Numerical Evaluation of Ventilation Efficiency in Underground Metro Rail Transport Systems 85 539–549 [35] Altay M and Sürmen A 2019 Fuel Effect of the relative positions of vehicular blockage on the smoke flow behaviour in a scaled tunnel 255 [36] Guo X, Pan X, Wang Z, Yang J, Hua M and Jiang J 2018 Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. Numerical simulation of fire smoke in extra-long river-crossing subway tunnels 82 82–98 [37] Zhang J, Li Y, Dai B, Li X and Huang Y 2018 Procedia Eng. The Effect of Exhaust Velocity on Smoke Exhaust in Subway Platform 211 1018–1025 [38] Chen F, Guo S C, Chuay H Y and Chien S W 2003 Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. Smoke control of fires in subway stations 16 349–368 [39] Meng N, Wang Q, Liu Z, Li X and Yang H 2017 Appl. Therm. Eng Smoke flow temperature beneath tunnel ceiling for train fire at subway station: Reduced-scale experiments and correlations 115 995–1003 [40] Meng N et al 2014 Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. Numerical study on the optimization of smoke ventilation mode at the conjunction area between tunnel track and platform in emergency of a train fire at subway station 40 151–159,. [41] Li D Y and Zhu G Q 2018 Procedia Eng. Effect of Platform Screen Doors on Mechanical Smoke Exhaust in Subway Station Fire 211 343–352 [42] Hu L, Wu L, Lu K, Zhang X, Liu S and Qiu Z 2014 Build. Simul. Optimization of emergency ventilation mode for a train on fire stopping beside platform of a metro station 7 137–146 [43] Wang W, He T, Huang W, Shen R and Wang Q 2018 Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. Optimization of switch modes of fully enclosed platform screen doors during emergency platform fires in underground metro station 81 277–288 [44] Roh J S, Ryou H S, Park W H and Jang Y J 2009 Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. CFD imulation and assessment of life safety in a subway train fire 24 447–453 [45] Wu F, Jiang J, Zhou R, Zhao D and Shi L 2018 Int. J. Vent. A new natural ventilation method for fire-induced smoke control in a common subway station 17 63–80 [46] Jung J, Kang S, Yoon H, Shin K and Lee J 2018 Hindawi Advances in Civil Engineering Analysis of Heat and Smoke Flow according to Platform Screen Door and Fan Conditions on Fire in Underground Platform 2018.