47 YANGIN VE GÜVENLİK • MART - NİSAN / 2025 ÇEVİRİ [15] M. Aleksandrov, et al., Modelling and finding optimal evacuation strategy for tall buildings, Saf. Sci. 115 (2019) 247–255, https://doi. org/10.1016/j. ssci.2019.02.017. [16] V. Viswanathan, M. Lees, An information processing based model of pre- evacuation behavior for agent based egress simulation, in: U. Weidmann, U. Kirsch, M. Schreckenberg (Eds.), Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012, Springer - Verlag, Germany, 2014, pp. 125–133. [17] R.R.M. Gershon, et al., Modeling pre-evacuation delay by evacuees in World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 on September 11, 2001: a revisit using regression analysis, Fire Saf. J. 46 (2011) 414–424, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2011.07.001. [18] E.D. Kuligowski, D.S. Mileti, Modeling pre-evacuation delay by occupants in world trade center towers 1 and 2 on september 11, 2001, Fire Saf. J. 44 (2009) 487–496, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.10.001. [19] R. Lovreglio, et al., A model of the decision-making process during pre-evacuation, Fire Saf. J. 78 (2015) 168–179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. firesaf.2015.07.001. [20] D. Nilsson, A. Johansson, Social influence during the initial phase of a fire evacuation – analysis of evacuation experiments in a cinema theatre, Fire Saf. J. 44 (2009) 71–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.03.008. [21] P.A. Reneke, Evacuation Decision Model, 2013, https://doi.org/10.6028/ NIST. IR.7914. [22] W. Saunders, Decision Making Model of Behaviour in Office Building Fire Evacuations, Thesis, Department of Psychology, Australia, 2001. [23] G. Santos, B. Aguirre, A critical review of emergency evacuation simulation models, in: Proceeding of Conference: Building Occupant Movement during Fire Emergencies, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2004. [24] O. Richardson, et al., Effects of environmental knowledge in evacuation scenarios involving fire and smoke: a multiscale modelling and simulation approach, Fire Technol. 55 (2019) 415–436, https://doi. org/10.1007/s10694-018-0743-x. [25] L. Fu, et al., The Influence of Emergency Signage on Building Evacuation Behavior: an Experimental Study, Fire and Materials, 2018, pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/ 10.1002/fam.2665. [26] E. Cubukcu, Investigating Wayfinding Using Virtual Environments, Dissertation, 2003. [27] M. Kinateder, et al., Exit choice in an emergency evacuation scenario is influenced by exit familiarity and neighbor behavior, Saf. Sci. 106 (2018) 170–175, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.015. [28] X. Song, R. Lovreglio, Investigating personalized exit choice behavior in fire accidents using the hierarchical Bayes estimator of the random coefficient logit model, Analytic Methods Accident Res. 29 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j. amar.2020.100140. [29] H.N. Lechner, M.D. Rouleau, Should we stay or should we go now? Factors affecting evacuation decisions at Pacaya volcano, Guatemala, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc. 40 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101160. [30] S. Thakur, et al., Investigating evacuation behaviour under an imminent threat of volcanic eruption using a logistic regression-based approach, Saf. Sci. 149 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105688. [31] M. Haghani, et al., Dynamics of social groups’ decision-making in evacuations, Transport. Res. Part C 104 (2019) 135–157, https://doi. org/10.1016/j. trc.2019.04.029. [32] A. Cuesta, et al., Alone or with others: experiments on evacuation decision making, Fire Saf. J. 120 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j. firesaf.2020.103018. [33] E.D. Kuligowski, Terror Defeated: Occupant Sensemaking, Decision-Making and Protective Action in the 2001 World Trade Center Disaster, Dissertation, University of Colorado, 2011. https://scholar. colorado.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_diss ertations/6t053g11g. [34] R. Zhu, et al., Virtual Reality-Based Studies of Human Emergency Behavior in Built Environments: A Systematic Review, Conference Paper, 2018. [35] S. Arias, A study on evacuation behavior in physical and virtual reality experiments, Fire Technol. 58 (2022) 817–849, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10694-021-01172-4. [36] Lovreglio, Exit choice in built environment evacuation combining immersive virtual reality and discrete choice modelling, Autom. ConStruct. 141 (2022) 104452, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104452. [37] K. Andr´ee, et al., Evacuation experiments in a virtual reality high-rise building: exit choice and waiting time for evacuation elevators, Fire Mater. 40 (2016) 554–567, https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.2310. [38] M. Kinateder, W.H. Warren, Social influence on evacuation behavior in real and virtual environments, Front. Robotics AI 3 (2016), https://doi. org/10.3389/ frobt.2016.00043. [39] M. Slater, et al., Small-group behavior in a virtual and real environment: a comparative study, Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 9 (2000) 37–51, https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566600. [40] S. Arias, et al., Forensic virtual reality: investigating individual behavior in the MGM Grand fire, Fire Saf. J. 109 (2019) 102861, https://doi. org/10.1016/j. firesaf.2019.102861. [41] Pathfinder – Technical Reference, Thunderhead Engineering, 2022. https: //support.thunderheadeng.com/docs/pathfinder/2022-1/technical-reference-manual/. [42] G. Stoet, PsyToolkit - a software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux, Behav. Res. Methods 42 (2010) 1096–1104. [43] G. Stoet, PsyToolkit: a novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments, Teach. Psychol. 44 (2017) 24–31. [44] Pyrosim User Manual, Thunderhead Engineering, 2022. https://files. thunderheade ng.com/support/documents/pyrosim-user-manual-2022-1.pdf. [45] E. Kuligowski, et al., Modeling evacuation decisions in the 2019 Kincade fire in California, Saf. Sci. 146 (2022) 105541, https://doi. org/10.1016/j. ssci.2021.105541. [46] H. Midi, et al., Collinearity diagnostics of binary logistic regression model, J. Interdiscipl. Math. 13 (3) (2010) 253–267, https://doi.org/10.1080/0972 0502.2010.10700699. [47] D.W. Hosmer, et al., Applied Logistic Regression, third ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118548387. [48] R. Johnston, et al., Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour, Qual. Quantity 52 (2018) 1957–1976, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11135-017-0584-6. [49] J.D. Sime, Affiliative behaviour during escape to building exits, J. Environ. Psychol. 3 (1983) 21–41. [50] D. Canter, J. Breaux, J. Sime, Domestic, multiple occupancy, and hospital fires, in: David Canter (Ed.), Fires and Human Behaviour, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1980, pp. 117–136. [51] A. Grimm, et al., Behavioural, emotional, and cognitive responses in European disasters: results of survivor interviews, Disasters 38 (2014) 62–83, https://doi. org/10.1111/disa.12034. [52] N. Bode, E. Codling, Human exit route choice in virtual crowd evacuations, Anim. Behav. 86 (2013) 347–358, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. anbehav.2013.05.025. [53] B. Latane´, J.M. Darley, Group inhibition of bystander intervention emergencies, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 10 (1968) 215–221, 368. [54] A. Megías-Robles, et al., Differences between risk perception and risk-taking are related to impulsivity levels, Int. J. Clin. Health Psyychol. 22 (2022) 100318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100318. [55] Y. Sun, J. Sun, Perception, preparedness, and response to tsunami risks in an aging society: evidence from Japan, Saf. Sci. 118 (2019) 466–474, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.060. [56] D. Hepperle, M. Wo¨lfel, Similarities and differences between immersive virtual reality, real world, and computer screens: a systematic scoping review in human behavior studies, Multimodal Technol. Inter. 7 (2023), https://doi.org/10.3390/ mti7060056.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTcyMTY=